Will Brexit and China continue to influence the Bitcoin price?

Over the past few weeks, uncertainty and various macroeconomic factors have attracted the interest of many investors to Bitcoin.

But will this Bitcoin profit trend continue?

Since January 2016, the Bitcoin profit share price has risen by more than 50%. Most market observers agree on the reasons for the rapid rise in Bitcoin profit prices: on the one hand, the depreciation of the Chinese yuan in China and on the other the BREXIT and the resulting withdrawal of the UK from the EU are mentioned.

It remains to be seen what will happen in the second half of the year and the influence of prices on the digital currencies will certainly remain exciting.

Some economists are sure that another one of China’s shakings from the UK’s BREXIT will drive many investors into safe and independent assets, including Bitcoin, which has often been referred to as a “safe haven” in times of crisis.

Three economists have talked to CoinDesk about the current situation and are trying to find out to what extent BREXIT could also have an impact on the superpower China.

The Risks of Bitcoin profit

Since both England and the European Union as a whole are important Bitcoin profit trading partners for China, economic problems could affect good business relations with China in both cases. If this is a scam, onlinebetrug will prove it.

Sam Rines, economist and portfolio manager at Avalon Avalon Advisors LLC, said in an interview with CoinDesk that a slowdown in demand for Chinese goods “poses an enormous risk to the Chinese economy”.

The domestic market for Chinese goods could also suffer if England triggered a domino effect with Brexit and other countries decided to leave the EU, says Usha Haley of West Virginia University.

In addition to the damage to trade, China’s foreign direct investments could suffer a severe blow, Haley said. Haley has been serving Chinese companies for a decade and advising them on foreign investment.

Vatican to investigate role of crypto currencies in human trafficking


The Vatican is serious: In its ambitious agenda to put an end to the modern slave trade, the Papal State is targeting crypto currencies. At the Vatican Conference against Human Trafficking last weekend, banker and crypto expert Joseph Mari of the Bank of Montreal was invited to the Apostolic See. He should inform about Kyptowährungen as money laundering instrument in the swamp of the human trafficking. With this unusual advance, the pontificate now declares war on human trafficking in the digital realm as well.

Blockchain as an opportunity for Bitcoin formula

As paradoxical as it may seem, the Catholic Church and the digital Bitcoin formula future are not mutually exclusive. This is proven by an expert hearing in the Vatican that took place last weekend. Rather, the Catholic Church, in its fight against human trafficking and modern slavery, is now also taking a look at the digital world. As Coindesk reports, Joseph Mari, Senior Manager of the Canadian Bank of Montreal, was also a guest of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences last weekend. He was supposed to draw attention to the role of Bitcoin formula crypto currencies as money laundering instruments in human trafficking and answered questions from the churchmen. His expertise should now strengthen the back of the papal fight against human trafficking.

According to United Nations estimates, hundreds of thousands of people are sold illegally every year and exploited as slaves in employment. 21 million men, women and children worldwide work under duress. Meanwhile, forms of such modern slavery appear in different forms. While women and children often work as sex slaves, thousands pay off loans in modern debt bondage or are bound to employers by temporary employment contracts. The International Labour Organization (ILO) estimates their unofficial profits from such forced labour at almost 150 billion US dollars a year.

Thus the church dares a promising leap forward and will possibly extend its Bitcoin trader strategies also into the digital space

With his election as Pope in 2013, Francis put the fight against human trafficking at the top of the agenda of his papal leadership course. Here is the Bitcoin trader review about it.

Pope Francis wants to counter this together with the leaders of other faith communities: According to a joint declaration, human trafficking and slavery “for all time” should be part of the past by 2020.

Another item on Joseph Mari’s agenda was the opportunities offered by blockchain technology and crypto currencies in cashless countries. These could, for example, help populations in developing countries who lack access to banks and financial services.

“Blockchain and crypto currencies must be on the radar of the Church. They must be perceived and used as something current. The faster the learning curve is overcome, the faster we can begin to work against the risks we face, said the blockchain and crypto expert about the importance of technologies for the Vatican’s agenda as church development agencies.

The hearings were part of a three-day programme to focus on the fight against human trafficking and modern slavery. The event was attended by Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the diplomatic head and Secretary of State of the Vatican, as well as numerous members of the leadership of the Papal State.

Strengthening smaller enterprises

Colangelo also claimed to be a user of Bitcoin products and that he has a broad interest in the technology. For example, he could imagine receiving part of his salary from payroll providers like BitWage in Bitcoin.

This would also affect the editorial direction of the company, Colangelo said, after expressing his desire to establish a Bitcoin-related part of Consumers’ Research to take care of hardware reviews for products such as Case, KeepKey and Ledger.

Bitcoin and Blockchain technology as potentially beneficial for the Bitcoin trader

As a co-owner of California metro Bitcoin trader manufacturer Golden Coast Mead, Colangelo sees the review about Bitcoin trader and Blockchain technology as potentially beneficial to technology-savvy small businesses.

Colangelo says he has investigated colored coins and digital resources on the blockchain. These could be used to contract his company’s products in the future. This, in turn, could enable pre-order purchases that would reduce Golden Coast’s liability if products were produced that did not meet sales expectations.

Alluding to the debate about private and public blockchains, he introduces Bitcoin as an internet-like tool. He says Bitcoin is especially interesting for those who don’t have the resources to perhaps develop better distributed account alternatives.

“With today’s technology, it’s easier for me to create a colored coin for 500 bottles of mead than using the blockchain technology from someone like Eris,” he said. “I logged in to create a blockchain and find some other computers [to secure the network]. I could do this through some cloud vendors, but eventually I can do it for free.”

This capability, he said, will expand the financial industry and make it easier for smaller banks to offer better services at lower cost. He added:

“JPMorgan will probably use private blockchains, but an open source alternative like Bitcoin will allow a small bank to keep up at the same level given the efficiency.

Marketing innovation for the crypto trader

In his comments, Colangelo enthusiastically emphasizes that all those currently involved in the Bitcoin and Blockchain crypto trader ecosystems come together at some point in history. This point in time will be looked back at similarly to the birth of the Internet.

“In 1994, we thought we had already tickled all the skills out of the Internet,” he continued. “We could not foresee about [the driving service] at that time. Some of these third party services could be replaced by a teenager developing an open source platform over the weekend simply because the economy gives it away.

However, he believes that it will become increasingly important for organizations like Consumers’ Research to inform the public about these new offerings. Ultimately, he said, Bitcoin companies cannot expect working families to invest time and energy in understanding how a new wave of financial products can be beneficial.

Finally, he stressed that this determination has encouraged him to bring this technology into line with his brand:

“Even if Consumers’ Research does not come first at CNBC, the Bitcoin price will explode. Even when we’re not there, we can say we did this important thing when Bitcoin was only known to a fraction of humanity.”

US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) goes on the offensive with regulation

On its homepage, the SEC publishes a surprisingly clear statement on “potentially illegal online platforms for trading digital assets”. The dispute over the regulation of ICOs and trading platforms in the USA has been smouldering for some time. Now the SEC is ringing in the next round.

For experts, the statement reads as a call to regulate digital currencies and initial coin offerings (ICOs). Registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission is mandatory for trading products that comply with the definition of SEC securities. This applies as long as no explicit exceptions have been granted. To determine whether a product is a security, the US Securities and Exchange Commission follows the 1946 Howey Test. According to the Supreme Court’s ruling, it must be a (cash) payment whose investment is expected to generate a profit. The investment is made in an ordinary company. The profit must be achieved outside the influence of the investors. If this is the case, the SEC speaks of a security.

In the statement, the SEC focuses on Bitcoin news and initial coin offerings

Also crypto currencies and providers of wallets are not scam. The SEC expressly points out that in case of doubt these must register with other state authorities. Although the focus of Bitcoin news regulation is initially limited to the USA, the effects can be felt far beyond the borders.

At the end of the publication, the authority refers to a now quite long list of cases in which the SEC has taken legal action against providers. These include fraud at AriseBank.

Bitcoin formula to be scrutinised more closely

In the Bitcoin formula, the SEC publishes a list of 13 questions that should help private investors to decide to invest: https://www.forexaktuell.com/en/bitcoin-formula-scam/ The answer to the question how “prices are determined on the platform” seems difficult. The following question is also broad: “Are all users of the platform treated equally?

Furthermore, the use of the term “exchange” is misleading, argues the SEC. It fears that consumers associate the term with a clearly regulated exchange. Moreover, providers’ statements about security standards and trading protocols should be treated with caution. Although platforms often speak of mature and secure systems, these guidelines are not subject to review. Although there are professional-looking order books on many platforms, “integrity”, as with providers confirmed by the SEC, is not necessarily to be expected.

Analysts are now expecting a series of subpoenas from the responsible platform operators. It is difficult to estimate how realistic it would be to obtain approval from the SEC. Some operators will consider adapting their business models as a precaution to avoid conflict with the authorities.

The platforms must either register with the National Securities Exchange or be granted an exemption. Although there are a number of theoretical exceptions, these do not exempt from regulation. They only subordinate providers to another supervisory authority and not directly to the SEC. From the point of view of the Securities and Exchange Commission, it is a matter of having the providers checked and monitored by a recognised body.

South Korea: A state relies on the blockchain

The South Korean government has yet to find a common denominator. First it prohibits its officials from trading and owning crypto currencies. Later it bans ICOs in its own country, but does not want to punish the investors. Now the government wants to invest heavily in the research of blockchain projects.

With the “Blockchain Technology Development Strategy” initiative, the Ministry of Information and Communication is strengthening the development and competitiveness of the private sector. Over the next five years, the ministry expects rapid growth in blockchain applications. The government does not want to miss this either. It wants to invest 230 billion won (around 180 million euros) in development and dissemination in order to strengthen South Korea as a business location. The government therefore wants to better understand the technology itself on the one hand and give incentives to the private sector to develop more on the other. The declared goal is to teach this technology to around 10,000 people who are not yet so deeply involved in the matter. The South Korean government expects to see up to 100 new technology companies by 2020.

Bitcoin code to become cashless

South Korea is supporting the Bitcoin code with the equivalent of over half a million euros. Regular competitions are to attract young people to develop creative solutions and implement them on the Bitcoin code Blockchain. In addition, lawyers and scientists in the civil service should understand the blockchain and crypto currencies better so that the government can pass the necessary laws. For many companies, as in many other countries, a concrete legal framework is lacking. In politics and state government, on the other hand, there is usually a lack of specialist knowledge. The South Koreans want to change this quickly.

The project reduces the social costs for the population by eliminating inefficient or superfluous processes, explains the ministry. This will significantly reduce the processing time for official decisions in the future. Both citizens and companies benefit from the time saved in waiting for decisions.

Model projects on the Bitcoin code

Blockchain technology is gaining ground worldwide in two sectors in particular. Logistics and finance companies are relying heavily on the new technology which is not a scam. The many individual transactions and transport routes are predestined for recording on the blockchain. The South Korean government is also relying on blockchain applications for its six model projects. One of these is also intended to improve logistics in the country. In addition, properties are to change owners faster and cheaper via the Bitcoin code Blockchain. Buyers and sellers can digitally sign the documents and send them to their notary and tax consultant. In elections, the technology should ensure fast and transparent counting. The blockchain should also ensure the food quality of meat products. Every step from production through transport to sale is documented on the blockchain. This gives consumers a transparent overview and enables them to better assess the quality of the meat.

In addition, the project also links up with the used car market: Anyone who has ever bought a used car from a stranger knows the unfortunate situation: Is the technology manipulated? Is it an accident car? What is the seller’s driving style? The buyer is not willing to pay the true price because he does not know the actual quality – a classic example of asymmetric information. The seller cannot credibly assure the potential buyer that he has always treated the car with care. A blockchain could record all the values over the life of the car and thus undoubtedly prove them when making a purchase.

The South Korean central bank is also relying heavily on the blockchain for its “cashless population” project. By 2020, coins and banknotes should have largely disappeared from the economic cycle – an ambitious goal. A crypto currency, or at least a combination of fiat and crypto currency, would be a tried and tested means of getting there faster. To achieve this, it is important to first inform the population about the new technologies and take away any concerns they may have.

So far all this sounds like the classic “blockchain instead of crypto” story. Meanwhile, however, the government is also considering slowly loosening the regulation, which has recently been strictly interpreted. South Korea is a comparatively small country that can boast rapid and high technological development. Despite its openness to technological innovation, the government has made z

Is a deviation from the wording of the law permissible?

The fact that fundamental deviations from the grammatical – as literal – interpretation of the law are possible is shown by case law and a consecutive letter from the Bavarian State Office for Taxes on Foreign Currency Loans. This letter covers the extension of time limits for fixed-term deposits in foreign currencies. In this context, it was questionable whether interest received, which could be considered income pursuant to § 23 (1) no. 2 sentence 4 EStG, could lead to an extension of the deadline. However, since the interest does not originate from the independent asset foreign currency, but rather from the capital claim denominated in foreign currency, a decision was taken against the application of the said provision.

Master Nodes, Staking, Mining, Bounties etc. – What is the remuneration actually paid for?

The block rewards and transaction costs received are remunerations for the services provided. Using the example of master nodes, the payments received are not justified by the original deposit; the user receives payments for the provision of services and functions. In the case of staking and mining, the income is also not generated by the respective coin; rather, in the case of mining and staking, block determination is the decisive factor for the receipt of the block reward. For this reason, the asset can also be viewed separately from the remunerated service in the case of crypto currencies. The payments which the taxpayer receives for his services in the respective systems are therefore not a result of the private asset crypto currency but rather a payment for the system services provided.

Conclusion – no extension of the deadline for cryptoassets?

Taking into account the arguments set out above, an extension of the speculation period by revenues from cryptoassets should regularly be unfounded. The extension of the deadline is to be understood as an anti-abuse provision, which was also born out of a concrete tax savings model. Since crypto currencies are not subject to a substance-related decline in value, it is impossible to design them as a tax-saving model. In addition, potential returns in many cases are not attributable to the use of the asset, but to system-related service offerings.

With significant investment amounts it is however quite advisable from risk aspects to obtain a legally binding information in accordance with § 89 AO before beginning the activity.

Klaus HimmerKlaus Himmer is managing director and co-founder of 21 Consulting (CryptoTax). He is an expert in the field of taxation of blockchain-based assets. As a consultant for a large auditing company, he advised banks, capital management companies and other financial service providers on product and corporate taxation issues.